Each week, we post a new excerpt from the latest edition of Bucknuts The Magazine.
BTM has evolved from humble beginnings as a 32-page magazine into its current
format as an 80-page magazine. It is published 10 times a year (monthly from
September through April, then once in the Spring and Summer).
The magazine retails for $4.95 on newsstands. We also sell annual
subscriptions to the magazine on the Internet for $39.95.
But the best deal going is our annual subscription bundle. For $99.95, you
get a full year of BTM as well as access to all of the premium content and
message boards on Bucknuts.com. Subscriptions to the web site, itself, are
priced at $9.95 per month. So, for roughly $100 you receive the value of almost
$160 between the web site and magazine.
In each issue of Bucknuts The Magazine, we have in-depth features on Ohio State football players, coaches and prospects. We also have analysis pieces on
the Buckeyes as well as their opponents, the Big Ten and college football world
in general. Plus, we have features on OSU athletes in a variety of sports,
including men's and women's basketball, hockey, wrestling, baseball and other
sports.
Order now and take advantage of our latest offer! Click here for more on Bucknuts the Magazine.
Headline: Homan A Part of OSU History
(From Nov. 2003)
By Charles Babb
Marv Homan worked in the Ohio State athletic department for almost four full
decades. He served as the sports information director at the university as well
as in other capacities. In 1988, he was given the Arch Ward Award by his peers.
The award is annually presented to someone who has enhanced their profession
through their contributions and conduct.
We caught up with Homan recently to chat about the OSU/Michigan rivalry and
take a look back at his days at Ohio State.
Bucknuts the Magazine: What is it like behind the scenes at OSU leading up to
the game?
Marvin Homan: “For some reason, and I guess I could give the answer to
that, the Michigan-Ohio State game was always something special. By special, I
mean from my point of view in all the years I was in the sports information
office, the press and radio -- and then to a certain extent I will throw
television into that -- was always the heaviest for the Michigan game. I
don’t think it was strictly because of the rivalry. I think that looking back
on it so many times, the Big Ten championship and the Rose Bowl was at stake,
and frequently both teams were in the same position. In other words, the winner
was going to win the Big Ten championship and was going to go to the Rose Bowl.
Then, almost invariably in other years, one or the other team would be so
involved. So, it always had a very special meaning beyond the rivalry that has
developed.”
BTM: When was your first Michigan game?
MH: “When I was a freshman in 1944.”
BTM: What do you remember about that game?
MH: “Well, that was a very memorable game because Ohio State went into
the game undefeated, and I think I am right… that the winner of the Ohio
State-Michigan game would be the Big Ten champions. I believe Michigan was in
the picture, although they had had at least one conference loss, and I am kind
of hazy on that, but it was of a huge game for Ohio State. I think it was also
nearly an equally big game for Michigan. Well, it was a typical Ohio-Michigan
game with the thing going back and forth. Ohio put together a fourth quarter
drive and scored a touchdown and ultimately won the game, it seems to me
something like 18-14, although you would have to look.”
[Editors note: After speaking to Marv, I looked it up. The final score was
18-14 and Michigan had only one conference loss up to that point.]
BTM: How many games have you seen at Ohio Stadium given that your first year
was 1944?
MH: “I have seen every home game since then with the exception of 1948,
and I have seen most of the road games. I retired after the 1987 season and have
not been to Michigan since and very frankly do not plan to go back again. That
is not my favorite place.”
BTM: Have you missed any home games since 1948?
MH: “I have missed one home game in 54 years. That was after the
September 11 episode. If you recall, Ohio State was to have played San Diego State, and by coincidence, and it was a huge coincidence, both teams had an off
date in October. Well, we had made plans to go to Florida, and it was just too
complicated to change it, so we went ahead and consequently I missed the San
Diego State game on the rescheduled date.”
BTM: Have you ever thought about the fact that this year you have seen 60 of
the 100 Ohio State-Michigan games?
MH: “No, it really hasn’t until you mention it. That number would be
substantial. I never even bothered to count them up.”
BTM: Since you were someone who was actually there, could you indulge us and
talk about the Snow Bowl?
MH: “Well, that was a nightmare, and it was a real shame. There was a
case of an Ohio State football team that was better than Michigan, and by all
odds deserved to go to the Rose Bowl, but the many offensive weapons that they
had were just taken away from them because of the weather. The game itself was
just a farce. Can you imagine a team winning a football game that one, never
completed a pass, and (two) never made a first down? That was Michigan. They did
two things: they blocked two kicks and one of them was recovered in the end
zone, and one of them went out of the end zone, and that was it.”
BTM: What happened that they even played that game?
MH: “Well, something happened that I don’t know that a visitor can
really do legally, but Michigan was coached by Fritz Crisler, and he was also
the athletic director. He made a remark before the game, ‘We will play the
game or we will cancel the game. We will not postpone it.’ In other words,
Michigan would not come back to Ohio State a week later. I would imagine if the
game were to be postponed, they would have said they would play it one week
later. Well, he said he would refuse to do that. I am not real sure that a
visitor can do that, but he did it and got away with it. There were other
factors. The refund situation would have been absolutely calamitous. That, along
with -- in this case -- the visiting team said they would either cancel it or we’ll
play it, but that’s it. I don’t know that they are in position to make those
demands, but they did it, and I guess you would say they got away with it.”
BTM: After the game, thousands had to be put up places there in
Columbus since they were stuck. Was the athletic department involved with that
effort?
MH: “I don’t know directly. I don’t think that was the case, but oh
yes, thousands of people were stranded. They couldn’t get out of Columbus. It
was just inundated with snow. Undoubtedly, that included thousands of Michigan
fans who had intended to go back to Ann Arbor after the game but couldn’t do
it. It created all kinds of weird situations. I think I can say without
precedent, we have never had a situation equal to that. My lands, I hope we
never have another one.”
BTM: What is the most extraordinary performance you have ever seen in The
Game by an Ohio State player?
MH: “I guess Hop Cassady’s performance in the game that wound up 17-0
up at Ann Arbor (1955). That was one of the most memorable Ohio State wins I
have ever seen. There again, it came against Michigan and with the championship
at stake. Cassady just had an exceptional game. I am sure that maybe there have
been others that in terms of statistics did more, but that one stands out.”
BTM: How about for a Michigan player? The one I think of is (Tim) Biakabatuka
in 1995.
MH: “Yeah. I would agree. I would almost say that was the – well, I
don’t ever remember anything exceeding that. We certainly made his
professional career, which as it turns out did not amount to much, but we got
him a good contract.”
BTM: What is the single greatest coaching performance you ever witnessed in
this series?
MH: “Well, I think of Earle Bruce’s last game as the head coach at
Ohio State. There is no kidding anybody -- Michigan figured to win that game,
and Michigan undoubtedly had the better team. Then, to make it even more
remarkable, it was up at Ann Arbor… just an outstanding game up there. That
score was 23-20.”
BTM: What was the atmosphere in the athletic department in the week leading
up to that game?
MH: “Well, I guess you would describe things as being rather gloomy.
One, there was a great deal of sentiment for Earle Bruce. That was a decision
that was basically made by the president, and it was forced upon Rick Bay, who
was then the athletic director. He just couldn’t bring himself to almost
deceiving Earle and his coaching staff the week of the game, and then,
regardless of the outcome, telling them after the game, ‘By the way, you’re
fired.’ So, in protest of the president’s decision, Rick Bay resigned as
well. Many in the athletic department had a very empty feeling because Earle was
gone for all intents and purposes, the assistant coaching staff was gone, and so
was the athletic director. The general feeling was that they just didn’t
deserve that, so it was kind of an empty feeling among the athletic department,
and frankly, I almost sensed a defeatest attitude regarding the final game with
Michigan because in all sincerity, Michigan probably had a better football team.
I don’t remember if they were in the championship picture then or not; if not,
they were certainly one of the top teams in the Big Ten. Of course, that was
just unfortunate all the way around because after Ohio State beat Michigan, they
had to turn down several bowl bids because they didn’t have a coach, and
technically, in all probability, didn’t have a coaching staff and no athletic
director. In other words, it was literally a ship without a rudder. As a result,
the team that had really rallied superbly around Earle was left high and dry and
was definitely cheated out of a bowl appearance. But anyway, the effort I
thought was a real tribute to that football team and the coaching staff, despite
a gloomy outlook, hung in there and did a great job. There have been other
upsets of course, but that one really stands out.”
BTM: What is the most disappointing loss to Michigan that you can remember?
MH: “Well, there have been a lot of them. Let’s see, in 1996 there
was the 13-9 loss. That team was undefeated going into the Michigan game, and
boy, they had just annihilated some teams. You remember Pittsburgh and Rice, and
they walloped Purdue, shut out Minnesota and Illinois. I mean, that was really a
great football team. Somehow or another they managed to lose the Michigan game
13-9. They had a measure of revenge in that they got to go to the Rose Bowl and
defeat Arizona State. That was, in my opinion, absolutely a national
championship caliber team, but of course the Michigan game did them in. They had
a great team in 1995, maybe not quite as good as ’96. That was a thrilling
football game. It was up at Ann Arbor, and we lost it 31-23, but in reality that
was a very disappointing loss, because I really think we had a better football
team than Michigan did.”
BTM: How close do you work with the coaching staff?
MH: “I had an almost daily contact with the coaching staff starting
with Woody. Not so much in 1951, 1952, or 1953, it really picked up in ’54
when we had that great team that went undefeated and went on to win the Rose
Bowl. That was a national championship team, and I had a daily contact with the
coaching staff.”
BTM: What is the temperament of the coaching staff during the week leading up
to The Game?
MH: “It would vary with the situation. You could go into the meeting
room say on a Monday following a game, and if the team had performed well, you
could kind of sense that in the general attitude of the assistants. If they had
played poorly and lost, or if they had had an injury or two to a key man who in
all likelihood was going to be out the following week, you could sense that. So,
it was really a week-by-week proposition. A lot of it hinged on the way the team
had played the preceding week and the general health of the team.”
BTM: What was Woody like after a loss to Michigan?
MH: “One, there was no question but that you could tell things did not
come out the way he wanted them or the way he thought they ought to… he
took so much of that personally. In other words, he felt that probably the
biggest single reason they lost is he did not do a good job of getting them
ready. That very frankly was not true, but that was what he at least conveyed to
outsiders. Oh, he was gloomy and kind of shot down, but goodness, you could talk
to him, and if there was some kind of a request that you felt was of an
important nature either to him or to Ohio State or to the football program, you
could certainly broach it to him. Generally, he was very receptive.”
BTM: Is there anything that sticks out to you about Woody and the Michigan
game?
MH: “I guess one of the stories that always amused me – and this is
true – it did happen. The week before a Michigan game, and this is hard to
believe, but he was to make an appearance somewhere. I don’t remember whether
it was recruiting or a speech or what it was – up in the Toledo area. For some
reason, he got across the state line and was actually in Michigan, and his gas
tank on his car registered empty. He told a sports writer (with him) that under
no conditions were we going to stop and get gas in Michigan and give them our
money and pay the gas tax, etc. They were going to get across the line whether
or not. It turns out that they made it, but they just made it. The car
quit going into a gas station, and that sort of reflected his emotional thinking
at the time that they were not going to spend any money in Michigan unless it
was absolutely necessary. Well, it nearly was, but as it turned out, he managed
to get back across the line and got back into Ohio.”
BTM: How much of that with Woody was real? I think what was missed is that he
could be a great actor when he chose to be.
MH: “In that case it was all real because he didn’t have any
audience. Oh yes, he was the actor. No question about it. A lot of things were
done for a certain effect. He was a very calculating individual.”
BTM: So was most of it real or was most of it acting?
MH: “I think it was both. He really – he worked himself up
deliberately into a feeling that, well, how can I say it? ‘Now it’s time to
play football. We’re going to put everything else aside and we have one
objective in mind and that is to beat Michigan in football.’ That was not an
act. But, some of the things leading up to that were. He had a clear-cut
objective. He knew how he wanted to be, but he wanted others to be – namely
members of the team and coaching staff – to be in the same general mood. There
is no doubt he would work himself up into a certain mental stance before not
really just Michigan, but other football games. Especially when there was a
championship at stake or a major non-conference opponent or something like that.
He had a variety of ways of working himself up in that position, but he expected
the coaching staff to do the same thing. Well, in some cases that was natural in
other cases it was not.”
BTM: What was the media coverage like during the stretch of 1968-1975 when
Ohio State and Michigan came into The Game both in top 5?
MH: “I don’t think there was really a great deal of difference.”
BTM: Every year, fans want to win a national title and beat Michigan in
Columbus, can you talk about that?
MH: “The expectations at Ohio State I think over the years have been
unrealistically high, and this has put the coach and the coaching staff at a
distinct disadvantage. There were some years in there where we were not a bad
football team but by no means were we of championship caliber. You wouldn’t
know that by some of the external writings and some of the preseason
publications, etc. It just seemed like Ohio State and Michigan were always down
as the favorites to win the Big Ten, and if they didn’t there certainly was
widespread disappointment. Well, yes there was – but that was magnified and
was really kind of drawn out of proportion. So, over all of those years we had
some … certainly some down years. Not so much in terms of losing records, but
we certainly had a losing record in I am going to say 1959.
BTM: With Woody, losing seasons were rare; can you talk about that team in
1959?
MH: “The interesting part of that was that was a good Ohio State
football team, but the second game of the season they went out to Southern
California and there were 17 injuries in that game. I don’t think we have ever
had a game equal that, and to be honest, the season ended out there the second
game of the season. They were never able to get anything approaching their
regular lineup back on the field. That happened the second game of the season.
Well, you look at that and that team won 3, lost 5, and tied 1 and you would
say, ‘My that was a poor season!’ Well, yes it was, but there was no doubt
why. They had some prominent football players, I mean really good, who were out
from the second – they were injured the second game – and either never
returned or were never the same after the injury in that particular game. So, I
remember that was one of Woody’s two losing seasons. Starting the season that
was a good football team and was a legitimate contender for the Big Ten
Championship. Now, you don’t know how they would have done because
unfortunately they were never able to play as a unit. So, it is problematic, but
that was a good football team. By no means was there any indication that that
was going to be a down year.”
BTM: Have you stayed in touch with any of the teams?
MH: “Oh some of them yes. Sure.”
BTM: What caused you to do that?
MH: “Well you get to know them. You get to know many of them when they
are here and you want to stay in touch. I mean, you develop friendships and that
does not end with their final game. Oh yes, I have many, many, many
friendships or fond memories. There was a time when as these reunions were held,
very frankly I was always invited back as kind of one of the unofficial team
members. I always took pride in that.”
BTM: When he was hired, was there talk about John Cooper’s victory over
Michigan in the Rose Bowl when he was hired?
MH: “I was retired then, so I don’t really know. I think from what I
can gather John was a very cooperative individual and was not at all difficult
to work with. But, well … it is just a strange thing. That (Michigan) was just
a team that just literally had a hex on him because you look at his overall won
and lost record, and it is rather impressive. It isn’t as good as Woody’s,
and it isn’t as good as Earle’s, but it certainly isn’t bad. But, he just
was not able to beat Michigan, and I often wondered if it was the fact that he
was not an Ohio State person and deep down inside didn’t quite understand that
rivalry. But maybe that isn’t the case. I don’t know. It is hard to say.
John was liked by members of the athletic department as far as I can see.”
BTM: Have the game day traditions changed at all since you have been
associated with The Game?
MH: “Oh, not nearly as much as you would think.”
BTM: What about the media coverage; can you compare and contrast the media
coverage from decades ago compared to today?
MH: “It is much greater now. I remember when we used to have special
drivers who would take writers – more writers than television or radio people
– out to the airport. They had special passes and that sort of thing, and I
think that is still done although now the after game file is probably heavier in
the press box – well not probably is – heavier now than it was when I
remember it. Then when that is over, the writers are literally on their own.
There does not seem to be quite the press after the game that there used to be.
It is kind of hard to explain and yet it is true, but that is just (part of)
evolution. I don’t think it has changed a great deal. The number has. It is
substantially more now.
BTM: How does a journalist of today differ from those of decades ago?
MH: “I suppose it is more of a business. I suppose the present day
journalists pride themselves on being totally objective, but that implies that
they weren’t back in the 50s, 60s, and 70s, and I don’t think that was true.
I think there is more of a tendency now to…criticize and to find fault with
the head coach, his style, certain players, what they do, what they don’t do,
what they can’t do, and that sort of thing. I don’t believe that was nearly
the case before. I think that maybe is the biggest difference. There are more
self-styled critics now than there used to be. I don’t mean that entirely in a
derogatory nature, yet in a way it is.”
BTM: When you started in the sports information department, how many people
were on staff?
MH: “Only two of us. When I started as an assistant in 1951, there were
just two of us. The director was a man by the name of Bill Snypp and myself and
that was it. That is all we had.”
BTM: How many were on staff when you retired?
MH: “Two full time. Then, two more that worked with women’s sports.
That would be four, and a secretary.”
BTM: Finally, who has been your favorite Ohio State coach to work with out of
all the sports – male, female, etc.?
MH: “Really that is tougher to answer than you might think, but I
suppose Fred Taylor, the (men’s) basketball coach, was the easiest and for all
intents was just totally cooperative. In other words, if I felt that it was
important either to basketball or indirectly to Fred or to the player than that’s
it. That is the way it is going to be. You can’t ask for anything more than
that.”